Posted Bycustardchuk on July 10, 2001 at 08:51:51:
I note our 5 minutes of fame and congratulate all those who worked tirelessly to provide a balanced view to "Research Rich". Is it just me who is uncomfortable with the portrayal of WRPS?
Despite receiving the best we have to offer, Rich would appear to have adopted a sensationalist approach to his article. He has given credence to theories commonly accepted as bunk, he has challenged the integrity and motivation of WRPS members and he has has resorted to cheap journalistic cliches (READ "At the very least, it's an enjoyable read." to white ant our beloved sport.
I believe it was example of gutter press disguised as caring, sharing reporting.
Every dog has its day, Rich.
woof woof
cc